For distilleries and visitor centres

Most flavour tools guess from region and reputation.

We don’t.

01Evidence, not reputationIn development

Evidence, not reputation

Your published phenol figures set the bounds on smoke. Your cask declarations set the direction on fruit and spice. Tasting prose only positions intensity inside them. Every number in your profile traces back to the evidence that produced it. What we can show you depends on whose evidence it is: where it is yours, or our own tasting, we can put the record in front of you. Where it is a third party’s writing, held privately as working material, we can tell you what it is and where it came from and walk you through the derivation — but we will not reproduce someone else’s words to do it. Either way the answer is a record, not an opinion.

Bring us your lab data and the platform treats it as first-class.

Where this stands today: declared data — cask, mashbill, age, strength, phenol — is captured with its provenance and shown to guests now. Two things are deliberately not yet true of it. The calibration that lets those figures shape a score is unwritten, because a prior guessed to look finished moves real numbers invisibly. And the founding catalogue was seeded from a curated export rather than derived, so those bottles carry profiles without an evidence record behind them. Everything mapped from here forward goes through the derivation path, and the seeded profiles are being re-derived against real evidence rather than left as they are.

Two of these numbers are confident. The third is why this page exists.We read your note, we took what it supports, and where it was ambiguous we recorded the ambiguity rather than rounding up.
What is unusual about this example, said rather than hidden. It is a thirty-year-old blend, not a core-range bottling — and it is here because it is the only bottle in the catalogue whose chain is complete end to end, not because it is impressive. The taster was us, so this is our record and not an independent source; a second source would raise these figures, and one does not. The producer’s own copy on this bottle — “indulgent, layered depth” — produced no characters at all, because vague words name no flavour. That is the rule working, not the copy failing.
Read the method →
02In the tasting roomIn development

In the tasting room

A guest steered to the right expression tastes happier and buys the bottle. The compass runs as a kiosk in your tasting room, scoped to your own range, in your branding.

The tasting-room surface is in development and does not ship today.

03What you learn

What you learn

Almost no distillery measures what visitors actually wanted at the point of tasting. Point of sale tells you what sold, which is a function of what you poured and what your host recommended. This is expressed intent, before the pour.

04How it works underneath

How it works underneath

Sixteen flavour characters, each anchored to a congener class rather than to a style or a region. Matching is deterministic geometry over those characters, and the formula is published in full — you can check a score by hand.

There is no model in the guest path. The same taps give the same answer every time.

The method →The sixteen characters →

Start with a conversation

Producer work begins with your data and what you want to learn from it, so it starts with a call rather than a sign-up form.